Hi,
I went to the Edinburgh Fringe last week.
Seeing how an individual could captivate an audience in a small space, unable to hide behind anything, left me feeling like an automaton. The creativity on display was awesome.
It made me think that in any pursuit, we have to submit ourselves in a way to be moulded. You have to learn the culture, mannerisms, practices, techniques, and fundamentals. An obvious example is the military, where you need to be subsumed and shaped into a specific product. The same is true for pretty much any pursuit.
You have to get good at the thing. But there’s also a pressure to fit in.
Medicine is similar; models of communication, attire, basic sciences, procedural memory - all these things have to be embodied over time. If push comes to shove, our individuality has to be secondary to this process. The outcome is what matters.
No one cares that the pilot is a hilarious orator if they’re crap at flying planes.
But as you move along the mastery process, then more space opens up to bring your own individuality forward.
Roger Kneebone describes this as developing your voice:
To be expert, your voice must remain recognisably yours, even when you are in situations you haven’t encountered before...To be effective, your voice must be authentic. You are drawing on aspects of yourself that are already there, not creating a new identity..
So whilst there’s something strangely alluring about becoming robotically skilled at your ‘thing’, this can come at the cost of your own voice within that space.
The consultants I remember most vividly brought aspects of themselves to their work, eccentricities and all.
Life is quite short, so it would be a shame to loose that. |